stmcan RT-Theme 18 Plugin up to 2.5 on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in stmcan RT-Theme 18 Plugin up to 2.5 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-39710. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in stmcan RT-Theme 18 Plugin up to 2.5 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in stmcan RT-Theme 18 | Extensions rt18-extensions allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RT-Theme 18 | Extensions: from n/a through <= 2.5.
The weakness was published by Bonds. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-39710 since 04/07/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-20417). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/07/2026 CVE reserved04/08/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/08/2026 VulDB entry created
04/08/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Bonds
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-39710 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-39710
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-356205
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 04/08/2026 12:58Updated: 04/08/2026 13:23
Changes: 04/08/2026 12:58 (55), 04/08/2026 13:23 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:F3B:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.