10web Form Maker Plugin up to 1.15.40 on WordPress validate_data sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in 10web Form Maker Plugin up to 1.15.40 on WordPress. Affected is the function WDW_FM_Library::validate_data. Performing a manipulation of the argument ip_search/startdate/enddate/username_search/useremail_search results in sql injection.
This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-3330. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in 10web Form Maker Plugin up to 1.15.40 on WordPress. This affects the function WDW_FM_Library::validate_data. The manipulation of the argument ip_search/startdate/enddate/username_search/useremail_search with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Form Maker by 10Web plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'ip_search', 'startdate', 'enddate', 'username_search', and 'useremail_search' parameters in all versions up to, and including, 1.15.40. This is due to the `WDW_FM_Library::validate_data()` method calling `stripslashes()` on user input (removing WordPress's `wp_magic_quotes()` protection) and the `FMModelSubmissions_fm::get_labels_parameters()` function directly concatenating user-supplied values into SQL queries without using `$wpdb->prepare()`. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. Additionally, the Submissions controller skips nonce verification for the `display` task, which means this vulnerability can be triggered via CSRF by tricking an administrator into clicking a crafted link.
The weakness was published by Sein Linn. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-3330 since 02/27/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploitation requires an enhanced level of successful authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/17/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 1.15.0
- 1.15.1
- 1.15.2
- 1.15.3
- 1.15.4
- 1.15.5
- 1.15.6
- 1.15.7
- 1.15.8
- 1.15.9
- 1.15.10
- 1.15.11
- 1.15.12
- 1.15.13
- 1.15.14
- 1.15.15
- 1.15.16
- 1.15.17
- 1.15.18
- 1.15.19
- 1.15.20
- 1.15.21
- 1.15.22
- 1.15.23
- 1.15.24
- 1.15.25
- 1.15.26
- 1.15.27
- 1.15.28
- 1.15.29
- 1.15.30
- 1.15.31
- 1.15.32
- 1.15.33
- 1.15.34
- 1.15.35
- 1.15.36
- 1.15.37
- 1.15.38
- 1.15.39
- 1.15.40
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.9
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/27/2026 CVE reserved04/17/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/17/2026 VulDB entry created
04/17/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comResearcher: Sein Linn
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-3330 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-3330
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-358005
Entry
Created: 04/17/2026 06:36Changes: 04/17/2026 06:36 (66)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.