liangliangyy DjangoBlog up to 2.1.0.0 Setting djangoblog/settings.py SECRET_KEY hard-coded credentials
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in liangliangyy DjangoBlog up to 2.1.0.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file djangoblog/settings.py of the component Setting Handler. This manipulation of the argument SECRET_KEY causes hard-coded credentials. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-6578. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in liangliangyy DjangoBlog up to 2.1.0.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the file djangoblog/settings.py of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation of the argument SECRET_KEY with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded credentials vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-798. The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-6578. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1110.001 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-23710). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded credentialsCWE: CWE-798 / CWE-259 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/19/2026 Advisory disclosed04/19/2026 VulDB entry created
04/20/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-6578 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-6578
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-358213
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 04/19/2026 07:16Updated: 04/20/2026 00:14
Changes: 04/19/2026 07:16 (58), 04/20/2026 00:14 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: Dem0
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #790283: liangliangyy DjangoBlog Hardcoded Credentials Hardcoded Credentials (by Dem0)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.