nimiq core-rs-albatross up to 1.2.x Validators::voting_keys return value
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in nimiq core-rs-albatross up to 1.2.x. This affects the function Validators::voting_keys. This manipulation causes return value.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-34065. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in nimiq core-rs-albatross up to 1.2.x. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Validators::voting_keys. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a return value vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-252. The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
nimiq-primitives contains primitives (e.g., block, account, transaction) to be used in Nimiq's Rust implementation. Prior to version 1.3.0, an untrusted p2p peer can cause a node to panic by announcing an election macro block whose `validators` set contains an invalid compressed BLS voting key. Hashing an election macro header hashes `validators` and reaches `Validators::voting_keys()`, which calls `validator.voting_key.uncompress().unwrap()` and panics on invalid bytes. The patch for this vulnerability is included as part of v1.3.0. No known workarounds are available.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-34065 since 03/25/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
Upgrading to version 1.3.0 eliminates this vulnerability. The upgrade is hosted for download at github.com. Applying the patch e10eaebcd7774e5da6d0ff5e88ed13503474f0ff is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.5
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Return valueCWE: CWE-252 / CWE-253
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: core-rs-albatross 1.3.0
Patch: e10eaebcd7774e5da6d0ff5e88ed13503474f0ff
Timeline
03/25/2026 CVE reserved04/22/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/22/2026 VulDB entry created
04/22/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: GHSA-7c4j-2m43-2mgh
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-34065 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-34065
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-359053
Entry
Created: 04/22/2026 22:27Changes: 04/22/2026 22:27 (67)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.