SenseLive X3050 1.523 Web Management Interface missing authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in SenseLive X3050 1.523. It has been classified as critical. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Web Management Interface. This manipulation causes missing authentication. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2026-27843. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in SenseLive X3050 1.523. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing authentication vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-306. The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. As an impact it is known to affect integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050's web management interface that allows critical configuration parameters to be modified without sufficient authentication or server-side validation. By applying unsupported or disruptive values to recovery mechanisms and network settings, an attacker can induce a persistent lockout state. Because the device lacks a physical reset button, recovery requires specialized technical access via the console to perform a factory reset, resulting in a total denial-of-service for the gateway and its connected RS-485 downstream systems.
The weakness was published by Jithin Nambiar J. The advisory is shared at senselive.io. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-27843 since 04/14/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/24/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.8
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.1
CNA Vector (icscert): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Missing authenticationCWE: CWE-306 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/14/2026 CVE reserved04/24/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/24/2026 VulDB entry created
04/24/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: senselive.ioResearcher: Jithin Nambiar J
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-27843 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-27843
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-359245
Entry
Created: 04/24/2026 07:27Changes: 04/24/2026 07:27 (75)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.