Authlib up to 1.6.10 authlib.integrations.starlette_client.OAuth cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Authlib up to 1.6.10. Affected by this issue is the function authlib.integrations.starlette_client.OAuth. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-41425. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Authlib up to 1.6.10. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function authlib.integrations.starlette_client.OAuth. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.6.11, there is no CSRF protection on the cache feature in authlib.integrations.starlette_client.OAuth. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.11.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-41425 since 04/20/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 310286 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-41425), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 1.6.11 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (310286). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
Website
- Product: https://github.com/authlib/authlib/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 310286
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-41425
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: Authlib 1.6.11
Timeline
04/20/2026 CVE reserved04/24/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/24/2026 VulDB entry created
04/27/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-41425 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-41425
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-359547
Entry
Created: 04/24/2026 21:56Updated: 04/27/2026 11:35
Changes: 04/24/2026 21:56 (63), 04/27/2026 11:35 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.