ShadowCloneLabs GlutamateMCPServers up to e2de73280b01e5d943593dd1aa2c01c5b9112f78 puppeteer_navigate src/puppeteer/index.ts url server-side request forgery

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in ShadowCloneLabs GlutamateMCPServers up to e2de73280b01e5d943593dd1aa2c01c5b9112f78. This affects an unknown part of the file src/puppeteer/index.ts of the component puppeteer_navigate. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-7094. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in ShadowCloneLabs GlutamateMCPServers up to e2de73280b01e5d943593dd1aa2c01c5b9112f78. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the file src/puppeteer/index.ts of the component puppeteer_navigate. The manipulation of the argument url with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-7094. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.

The exploit is available at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6

VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Server-side request forgery
CWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Timelineinfo

04/26/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/26/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
04/26/2026 +0 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Product: github.com

Advisory: github.com
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2026-7094 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-7094
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-359669
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013

Entryinfo

Created: 04/26/2026 10:57
Changes: 04/26/2026 10:57 (58)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: BruceJin
Cache ID: 216::103

Submitinfo

Accepted

  • Submit #800725: ShadowCloneLabs GlutamateMCPServers Commit e2de73280b01e5d943593dd1aa2c01c5b9112f78 Server-Side Request Forgery (by BruceJin)

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!