Foxit PDF Editor/PDF Reader prior 13.2.4 std::invalid_argument uncaught exception
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Foxit PDF Editor and PDF Reader. Affected is the function std::invalid_argument. Performing a manipulation results in uncaught exception.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-5937. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Foxit PDF Editor and PDF Reader. This affects the function std::invalid_argument. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a uncaught exception vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-248. An exception is thrown from a function, but it is not caught. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Insufficient parameter verification leads to the occurrence of format errors in files, which will trigger an unhandled "std::invalid_argument" exception, ultimately causing the program to terminate.
The weakness was disclosed by CITIVD. It is possible to read the advisory at foxit.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-5937 since 04/09/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 310407 (Foxit PDF Editor < 13.2.4 Multiple Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 13.2.4 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (310407) and EUVD (EUVD-2026-25823). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.foxitsoftware.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.5
CNA Vector (Foxit): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Uncaught exceptionCWE: CWE-248
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 310407
Nessus Name: Foxit PDF Editor < 13.2.4 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: PDF Editor/PDF Reader 13.2.4
Timeline
04/09/2026 CVE reserved04/27/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/27/2026 VulDB entry created
05/06/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: foxitsoftware.comAdvisory: foxit.com
Researcher: CITIVD
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-5937 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-5937
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-359787
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 04/27/2026 15:14Updated: 05/06/2026 19:01
Changes: 04/27/2026 15:14 (62), 04/27/2026 16:31 (1), 04/27/2026 22:39 (2), 05/06/2026 18:58 (2), 05/06/2026 19:01 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Committer: lywand
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.