Milesight MS-Cxx72-FIPKG1 SSL Certificate hard-coded key
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Milesight MS-Cxx63-PD, MS-Cxx64-xPD, MS-Cxx73-xPD, MS-Cxx75-xxPD, MS-Cxx83-xPD, MS-Cxx74-PA, MS-C8477-HPG1, MS-C8477-PC, MS-C5321-FPE, MS-Cxx72-xxxPE, MS-Cxx62-xxxPE, MS-Cxx52-xxxPE, MS-Cxx66-xxxPE, MS-Cxx66-xxxGPE, MS-Cxx61-xxxPE, MS-Cxx67-xxxPE, MS-Cxx71-xxxPE, MS-Cxx41-xxxPE, MS-Cxx76-PE, MS-Cxx65-PE, MS-Cxx66-xxxG1, MS-Cxx62-xxxG1, MS-Cxx72-xxxG1, MS-CQxx31-xxxG1, MS-CQxx68-xxxG1, MS-CQxx72-xxxG1, MS-Nxxxx-NxE, MS-Nxxxx-xxC, MS-Nxxxx-xxE, MS-Nxxxx-xxG, MS-Nxxxx-xxH, MS-Nxxxx-xxT, PMC8266-FPE, PMC8266-FGPE, PM3322-E, TS4466-X4RIPG1, TS5366-X12RIPG1, TS8266-X4RIPG1, TS4466-X4RIVPG1, TS4466-RFIVPG1, TS8266-X4RIVPG1, TS8266-RFIVPG1, TS4466-X4RIWG1, TS8266-X4RIWG1, TS5510-GVH, TS5510-GH, TS5511-GVH, TS2966-X12TPE, TS4466-X4RPE, TS5366-X12PE, TS8266-X4PE, TS2966-X12TVPE, TS4466-X4RVPE, TS5366-X12VPE, TS8266-X4VPE, TS4441-X36RPE, TS4441-X36RE, TS4466-X4RWE, TS8266-X4WE, MS-C2964-RFLPC, MS-C2972-RFLPC, MS-C2966-RFLWPC, TS2866-X4TPC, TS2866-X4TVPC, TS2866-X4TGPC, TS2841-X36TPC, W, TS2867-X5TPC, TS2961-X12TPC, TS8266-FPC, P, MS-C2966-X12RLPC, MS-C2966-X12RLVPC, MS-C5366-X12LPC, MS-C5366-X12LVPC, MS-C5361-X12LPC, MS-Cxx66-xxxxGOPC, SC211, SP111, MS-Cxx66-RFIPKG1, MS-Cxx72-RFIPKG1, MS-Cxx66-FIPKG1 and MS-Cxx72-FIPKG1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component SSL Certificate Handler. Performing a manipulation results in hard-coded key. This vulnerability was named CVE-2026-32644. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Milesight MS-Cxx63-PD, MS-Cxx64-xPD, MS-Cxx73-xPD, MS-Cxx75-xxPD, MS-Cxx83-xPD, MS-Cxx74-PA, MS-C8477-HPG1, MS-C8477-PC, MS-C5321-FPE, MS-Cxx72-xxxPE, MS-Cxx62-xxxPE, MS-Cxx52-xxxPE, MS-Cxx66-xxxPE, MS-Cxx66-xxxGPE, MS-Cxx61-xxxPE, MS-Cxx67-xxxPE, MS-Cxx71-xxxPE, MS-Cxx41-xxxPE, MS-Cxx76-PE, MS-Cxx65-PE, MS-Cxx66-xxxG1, MS-Cxx62-xxxG1, MS-Cxx72-xxxG1, MS-CQxx31-xxxG1, MS-CQxx68-xxxG1, MS-CQxx72-xxxG1, MS-Nxxxx-NxE, MS-Nxxxx-xxC, MS-Nxxxx-xxE, MS-Nxxxx-xxG, MS-Nxxxx-xxH, MS-Nxxxx-xxT, PMC8266-FPE, PMC8266-FGPE, PM3322-E, TS4466-X4RIPG1, TS5366-X12RIPG1, TS8266-X4RIPG1, TS4466-X4RIVPG1, TS4466-RFIVPG1, TS8266-X4RIVPG1, TS8266-RFIVPG1, TS4466-X4RIWG1, TS8266-X4RIWG1, TS5510-GVH, TS5510-GH, TS5511-GVH, TS2966-X12TPE, TS4466-X4RPE, TS5366-X12PE, TS8266-X4PE, TS2966-X12TVPE, TS4466-X4RVPE, TS5366-X12VPE, TS8266-X4VPE, TS4441-X36RPE, TS4441-X36RE, TS4466-X4RWE, TS8266-X4WE, MS-C2964-RFLPC, MS-C2972-RFLPC, MS-C2966-RFLWPC, TS2866-X4TPC, TS2866-X4TVPC, TS2866-X4TGPC, TS2841-X36TPC, W, TS2867-X5TPC, TS2961-X12TPC, TS8266-FPC, P, MS-C2966-X12RLPC, MS-C2966-X12RLVPC, MS-C5366-X12LPC, MS-C5366-X12LVPC, MS-C5361-X12LPC, MS-Cxx66-xxxxGOPC, SC211, SP111, MS-Cxx66-RFIPKG1, MS-Cxx72-RFIPKG1, MS-Cxx66-FIPKG1 and MS-Cxx72-FIPKG1. This affects some unknown processing of the component SSL Certificate Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded key vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-321. The use of a hard-coded cryptographic key significantly increases the possibility that encrypted data may be recovered. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Specific firmware versions of Milesight AIOT cameras use SSL certificates with default private keys.
The weakness was presented by Souvik Kandar as icsa-26-113-03. It is possible to read the advisory at cisa.gov. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-32644 since 03/12/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/28/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1600.001 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
- MS-C2964-RFLPC
- MS-C2966-RFLWPC
- MS-C2966-X12RLPC
- MS-C2966-X12RLVPC
- MS-C2972-RFLPC
- MS-C5321-FPE
- MS-C5361-X12LPC
- MS-C5366-X12LPC
- MS-C5366-X12LVPC
- MS-C8477-HPG1
- MS-C8477-PC
- MS-CQxx31-xxxG1
- MS-CQxx68-xxxG1
- MS-CQxx72-xxxG1
- MS-Cxx41-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx52-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx61-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx62-xxxG1
- MS-Cxx62-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx63-PD
- MS-Cxx64-xPD
- MS-Cxx65-PE
- MS-Cxx66-FIPKG1
- MS-Cxx66-RFIPKG1
- MS-Cxx66-xxxG1
- MS-Cxx66-xxxGPE
- MS-Cxx66-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx66-xxxxGOPC
- MS-Cxx67-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx71-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx72-FIPKG1
- MS-Cxx72-RFIPKG1
- MS-Cxx72-xxxG1
- MS-Cxx72-xxxPE
- MS-Cxx73-xPD
- MS-Cxx74-PA
- MS-Cxx75-xxPD
- MS-Cxx76-PE
- MS-Cxx83-xPD
- MS-Nxxxx-NxE
- MS-Nxxxx-xxC
- MS-Nxxxx-xxE
- MS-Nxxxx-xxG
- MS-Nxxxx-xxH
- MS-Nxxxx-xxT
- P
- PM3322-E
- PMC8266-FGPE
- PMC8266-FPE
- SC211
- SP111
- TS2841-X36TPC
- TS2866-X4TGPC
- TS2866-X4TPC
- TS2866-X4TVPC
- TS2867-X5TPC
- TS2961-X12TPC
- TS2966-X12TPE
- TS2966-X12TVPE
- TS4441-X36RE
- TS4441-X36RPE
- TS4466-RFIVPG1
- TS4466-X4RIPG1
- TS4466-X4RIVPG1
- TS4466-X4RIWG1
- TS4466-X4RPE
- TS4466-X4RVPE
- TS4466-X4RWE
- TS5366-X12PE
- TS5366-X12RIPG1
- TS5366-X12VPE
- TS5510-GH
- TS5510-GVH
- TS5511-GVH
- TS8266-FPC
- TS8266-RFIVPG1
- TS8266-X4PE
- TS8266-X4RIPG1
- TS8266-X4RIVPG1
- TS8266-X4RIWG1
- TS8266-X4VPE
- TS8266-X4WE
- W
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (icscert): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded keyCWE: CWE-321 / CWE-320
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
03/12/2026 CVE reserved04/28/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/28/2026 VulDB entry created
04/28/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: icsa-26-113-03Researcher: Souvik Kandar
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-32644 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-32644
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-359883
Entry
Created: 04/28/2026 06:31Changes: 04/28/2026 06:31 (74)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.