Linux Kernel up to 6.19.11 Bluetooth mesh_send adv_data[] buffer overflow

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.6 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Linux Kernel up to 6.1.167/6.6.133/6.12.80/6.18.21/6.19.11. This vulnerability affects the function mesh_send of the component Bluetooth. Performing a manipulation of the argument adv_data[] results in buffer overflow.
This vulnerability was named CVE-2026-43017. The attack needs to be approached within the local network. There is no available exploit.
It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Linux Kernel up to 6.1.167/6.6.133/6.12.80/6.18.21/6.19.11. This affects the function mesh_send of the component Bluetooth. The manipulation of the argument adv_data[] with an unknown input leads to a buffer overflow vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-120. The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: MGMT: validate mesh send advertising payload length mesh_send() currently bounds MGMT_OP_MESH_SEND by total command length, but it never verifies that the bytes supplied for the flexible adv_data[] array actually match the embedded adv_data_len field. MGMT_MESH_SEND_SIZE only covers the fixed header, so a truncated command can still pass the existing 20..50 byte range check and later drive the async mesh send path past the end of the queued command buffer. Keep rejecting zero-length and oversized advertising payloads, but validate adv_data_len explicitly and require the command length to exactly match the flexible array size before queueing the request.
The advisory is shared at git.kernel.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-43017 since 05/01/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. The attack needs to be initiated within the local network. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 05/01/2026).
Upgrading to version 6.1.168, 6.6.134, 6.12.81, 6.18.22 or 6.19.12 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying the patch 24fa32369cf15d8fc918bdfe94097b12e6acada0/244b639e6a3a8e26241e201004a3a9f764476631/0b706fb2294aff3adfd54653bda1b5e356ad4566/edb5898cfa91afe7e8f83eda18d93034c953d632/562ed1954f0c1bff3422b7b752bd3dacf185edbf/bda93eec78cdbfe5cda00785cefebd443e56b88b is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at git.kernel.org. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 6.1.167
- 6.6.133
- 6.12.0
- 6.12.1
- 6.12.2
- 6.12.3
- 6.12.4
- 6.12.5
- 6.12.6
- 6.12.7
- 6.12.8
- 6.12.9
- 6.12.10
- 6.12.11
- 6.12.12
- 6.12.13
- 6.12.14
- 6.12.15
- 6.12.16
- 6.12.17
- 6.12.18
- 6.12.19
- 6.12.20
- 6.12.21
- 6.12.22
- 6.12.23
- 6.12.24
- 6.12.25
- 6.12.26
- 6.12.27
- 6.12.28
- 6.12.29
- 6.12.30
- 6.12.31
- 6.12.32
- 6.12.33
- 6.12.34
- 6.12.35
- 6.12.36
- 6.12.37
- 6.12.38
- 6.12.39
- 6.12.40
- 6.12.41
- 6.12.42
- 6.12.43
- 6.12.44
- 6.12.45
- 6.12.46
- 6.12.47
- 6.12.48
- 6.12.49
- 6.12.50
- 6.12.51
- 6.12.52
- 6.12.53
- 6.12.54
- 6.12.55
- 6.12.56
- 6.12.57
- 6.12.58
- 6.12.59
- 6.12.60
- 6.12.61
- 6.12.62
- 6.12.63
- 6.12.64
- 6.12.65
- 6.12.66
- 6.12.67
- 6.12.68
- 6.12.69
- 6.12.70
- 6.12.71
- 6.12.72
- 6.12.73
- 6.12.74
- 6.12.75
- 6.12.76
- 6.12.77
- 6.12.78
- 6.12.79
- 6.12.80
- 6.18.0
- 6.18.1
- 6.18.2
- 6.18.3
- 6.18.4
- 6.18.5
- 6.18.6
- 6.18.7
- 6.18.8
- 6.18.9
- 6.18.10
- 6.18.11
- 6.18.12
- 6.18.13
- 6.18.14
- 6.18.15
- 6.18.16
- 6.18.17
- 6.18.18
- 6.18.19
- 6.18.20
- 6.18.21
- 6.19.0
- 6.19.1
- 6.19.2
- 6.19.3
- 6.19.4
- 6.19.5
- 6.19.6
- 6.19.7
- 6.19.8
- 6.19.9
- 6.19.10
- 6.19.11
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.kernel.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Base Score: 8.0
VulDB Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Buffer overflowCWE: CWE-120 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: Kernel 6.1.168/6.6.134/6.12.81/6.18.22/6.19.12
Patch: 24fa32369cf15d8fc918bdfe94097b12e6acada0/244b639e6a3a8e26241e201004a3a9f764476631/0b706fb2294aff3adfd54653bda1b5e356ad4566/edb5898cfa91afe7e8f83eda18d93034c953d632/562ed1954f0c1bff3422b7b752bd3dacf185edbf/bda93eec78cdbfe5cda00785cefebd443e56b88b
Timeline
05/01/2026 Advisory disclosed05/01/2026 CVE reserved
05/01/2026 VulDB entry created
05/01/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: kernel.orgAdvisory: git.kernel.org
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-43017 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-43017
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-360693
Entry
Created: 05/01/2026 17:58Changes: 05/01/2026 17:58 (60)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.