osTicket up to 1.18.3 Dispatcher class.dispatcher.php _method cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in osTicket up to 1.18.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2026-8194. The attack can be executed remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet.
Details
A vulnerability was found in osTicket up to 1.18.3. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown code block of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The advisory is available at github.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-8194. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
The exploit is shared for download at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet. By approaching the search of inurl:include/class.dispatcher.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-28938). If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Google Hack: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/08/2026 Advisory disclosed05/08/2026 VulDB entry created
05/09/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 6945
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-8194 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-8194
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-362346
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 05/08/2026 22:14Updated: 05/09/2026 23:47
Changes: 05/08/2026 22:14 (58), 05/09/2026 23:47 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: AliAz
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #802755: osTicket 1.18.3 Cross-Site Request Forgery (by AliAz)
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.