| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Fortinet FortiNDR up to 7.0.7/7.1.1/7.2.5/7.4.9/7.6.2. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component HTTP Handler. This manipulation causes sql injection. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-25088. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Fortinet FortiNDR up to 7.0.7/7.1.1/7.2.5/7.4.9/7.6.2 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the component HTTP Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiNDR 7.2 all versions, FortiNDR 7.1 all versions, FortiNDR 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.
The advisory is shared at fortiguard.fortinet.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-25088 since 01/29/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.0.0
- 7.0.1
- 7.0.2
- 7.0.3
- 7.0.4
- 7.0.5
- 7.0.6
- 7.0.7
- 7.1.0
- 7.1.1
- 7.2.0
- 7.2.1
- 7.2.2
- 7.2.3
- 7.2.4
- 7.2.5
- 7.4.0
- 7.4.1
- 7.4.2
- 7.4.3
- 7.4.4
- 7.4.5
- 7.4.6
- 7.4.7
- 7.4.8
- 7.4.9
- 7.6.0
- 7.6.1
- 7.6.2
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.fortinet.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (fortinet): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
01/29/2026 CVE reserved05/12/2026 Advisory disclosed
05/12/2026 VulDB entry created
05/19/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: fortinet.comAdvisory: FG-IR-26-134
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-25088 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-25088
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-363253
Entry
Created: 05/12/2026 20:22Updated: 05/19/2026 04:08
Changes: 05/12/2026 20:22 (64), 05/19/2026 04:08 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.