Joomlaextensions JoomOCShop 1.0 on Joomla User Information edit cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Joomlaextensions JoomOCShop 1.0 on Joomla. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the file /joomoc2/?route=account/edit of the component User Information Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-25337. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Joomlaextensions JoomOCShop 1.0 on Joomla. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function of the file /joomoc2/?route=account/edit of the component User Information Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Joomla JoomOCShop 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms targeting account endpoints like /joomoc2/?route=account/edit and to modify user information or reset passwords without user consent.
It is possible to read the advisory at exploit-db.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-25337 since 05/17/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (44789) and EUVD (EUVD-2018-21860). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔒
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/17/2026 Advisory disclosed05/17/2026 CVE reserved
05/17/2026 VulDB entry created
05/17/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 44789Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-25337 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-25337
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-364427
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 05/17/2026 16:20Updated: 05/17/2026 18:12
Changes: 05/17/2026 16:20 (83), 05/17/2026 18:12 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.