Keycloak on Red Hat improper validation of consistency within input
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Keycloak on Red Hat. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in improper validation of consistency within input. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-9689. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Keycloak on Red Hat (affected version not known). Affected is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper validation of consistency within input vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-1288. The product receives a complex input with multiple elements or fields that must be consistent with each other, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually consistent. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
A flaw was found in Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a client application is configured to accept broad redirect Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), a remote attacker can manipulate the authentication process by crafting a special web address. If a user clicks this link, the client application might incorrectly prioritize attacker-controlled information over legitimate data. This vulnerability, known as HTTP parameter pollution, could allow an attacker to bypass security measures or gain unauthorized access to resources.
The advisory is shared for download at access.redhat.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-9689 since 05/27/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 05/27/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.2
CNA Vector (redhat): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper validation of consistency within inputCWE: CWE-1288 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/27/2026 Advisory disclosed05/27/2026 CVE reserved
05/27/2026 VulDB entry created
05/27/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: access.redhat.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-9689 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-9689
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-366060
Entry
Created: 05/27/2026 16:09Changes: 05/27/2026 16:09 (60)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.