OpenReplay up to 1.25.x Authenticated API app_apikey access control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in OpenReplay up to 1.25.x. Affected is the function app_apikey of the component Authenticated API. The manipulation leads to access control.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-45296. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in OpenReplay up to 1.25.x and classified as critical. This issue affects the function app_apikey of the component Authenticated API. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-284. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, OpenReplay's Python API exposes several app_apikey routes that trust a caller-provided projectKey after validating only that the API key itself is valid and that the target projectKey exists. The authorization flow does not verify that the authenticated API key and the requested project belong to the same tenant. Because the public tracker design exposes projectKey to browser-side code, an attacker who owns any valid API key for their own tenant can target another tenant's project by reusing that public projectKey. The vulnerable routes allow the attacker to enumerate victim user sessions and then retrieve sensitive session event data across the tenant boundary. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-45296 since 05/11/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
Upgrading to version 1.26.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-32971). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.7
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: OpenReplay 1.26.0
Timeline
05/11/2026 CVE reserved05/28/2026 Advisory disclosed
05/28/2026 VulDB entry created
05/30/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-45296 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-45296
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-366827
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 05/28/2026 20:11Updated: 05/30/2026 06:46
Changes: 05/28/2026 20:11 (64), 05/30/2026 06:46 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.