TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20 /goform/formPortFw server_name stack-based overflow

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formPortFw of the file /goform/formPortFw. This manipulation of the argument server_name causes stack-based overflow. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-10158. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
The vendor explains: "This product has been EOL for 15 years (since 2009). As the item has been EOL for such a long time, we are not able to replicate or fix any vulnerabilities."
Details
A vulnerability has been found in TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formPortFw of the file /goform/formPortFw. The manipulation of the argument server_name with an unknown input leads to a stack-based overflow vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-121. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-10158. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor explains: "This product has been EOL for 15 years (since 2009). As the item has been EOL for such a long time, we are not able to replicate or fix any vulnerabilities."
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-33477). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Support
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Stack-based overflowCWE: CWE-121 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/30/2026 Advisory disclosed05/30/2026 VulDB entry created
05/31/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-10158 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-10158
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-367411
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 05/30/2026 09:05Updated: 05/31/2026 05:56
Changes: 05/30/2026 09:05 (58), 05/31/2026 05:56 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: pjq_Buoy
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #814768: TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20 Stack-based Buffer Overflow (by pjq_Buoy)
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.