Django up to 5.2.14/6.0.5 django.http.HttpRequest.get_signed_cookie salt signature verification

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
3.0$0-$5k3.09-

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Django up to 5.2.14/6.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function django.http.HttpRequest.get_signed_cookie. The manipulation of the argument salt leads to signature verification. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-6873. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Django up to 5.2.14/6.0.5. This issue affects the function django.http.HttpRequest.get_signed_cookie. The manipulation of the argument salt with an unknown input leads to a signature verification vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-347. The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.6 and 5.2 before 5.2.15. `django.http.HttpRequest.get_signed_cookie` in Django uses a non-injective salt derivation (concatenating the cookie name and salt argument), which allows a remote attacker to use a cookie in a context different from the one where it was signed, via distinct `(name, salt)` pairs that produce the same concatenation. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Peng Zhou for reporting this issue.

The weakness was shared by Peng Zhou. The advisory is shared at docs.djangoproject.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-6873 since 04/22/2026. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 06/04/2026).

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 318412 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-6873), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.

Upgrading to version 5.2.15 or 6.0.6 eliminates this vulnerability. The upgrade is hosted for download at docs.djangoproject.com.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (318412). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.0

VulDB Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Temp Score: 3.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 3.1
CNA Vector (DSF): 🔒

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Signature verification
CWE: CWE-347 / CWE-345
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 318412
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-6873

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Upgrade: Django 5.2.15/6.0.6

Timelineinfo

04/22/2026 CVE reserved
06/03/2026 +42 days Advisory disclosed
06/03/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
06/04/2026 +1 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: docs.djangoproject.com
Researcher: Peng Zhou
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2026-6873 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-6873
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-368129

Entryinfo

Created: 06/03/2026 16:38
Updated: 06/04/2026 08:35
Changes: 06/03/2026 16:38 (78), 06/04/2026 08:35 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!