Cotonti 1.0.0 modules/pfs/inc/pfs.main cot_check_xg cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 3.42- |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Cotonti 1.0.0 and classified as problematic. Impacted is the function cot_check_xg of the file modules/pfs/inc/pfs.main. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery.
This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-55744. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Cotonti 1.0.0. This issue affects the function cot_check_xg of the file modules/pfs/inc/pfs.main. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the Personal File Storage (PFS) module. In modules/pfs/inc/pfs.main.php, the file upload action ('a=upload') processes uploaded files without calling cot_check_xg() to validate the anti-CSRF token, even though sibling actions such as 'delete' (line 272) do. A remote attacker who lures an authenticated user into visiting a malicious page can force the browser to submit a forged multipart request that uploads arbitrary files into the victim's PFS storage.
The weakness was shared by Saidakbarxon Maxsudxonov. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-55744 since 06/17/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-37855). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
Website
- Product: https://github.com/Cotonti/Cotonti/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.1
CNA Vector (TuranSec): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
06/17/2026 CVE reserved06/18/2026 Advisory disclosed
06/18/2026 VulDB entry created
06/18/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Researcher: Saidakbarxon Maxsudxonov
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-55744 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-55744
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-372179
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 06/18/2026 09:44Updated: 06/18/2026 14:20
Changes: 06/18/2026 09:44 (42), 06/18/2026 09:45 (34), 06/18/2026 14:20 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.