| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 7.74- |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in libexpat up to 2.8.1. It has been rated as problematic. This impacts an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in integer overflow. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-56410. Attacking locally is a requirement. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in libexpat up to 2.8.1. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a integer overflow vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-190. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
xmlwf in libexpat before 2.8.2 has an integer overflow in resolveSystemId.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-56410 since 06/21/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 321890 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-56410), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 2.8.2 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (321890), EUVD (EUVD-2026-38187) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2026-2025). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Affected
- Open Source expat
Product
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.5
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.9
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Integer overflowCWE: CWE-190 / CWE-189
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 321890
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-56410
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: libexpat 2.8.2
Patch: github.com
Timeline
06/21/2026 Advisory disclosed06/21/2026 CVE reserved
06/21/2026 VulDB entry created
06/22/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-56410 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-56410
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-372645
EUVD: 🔒
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2026-2025 - libexpat: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff
Entry
Created: 06/21/2026 19:18Updated: 06/22/2026 12:52
Changes: 06/21/2026 19:18 (62), 06/21/2026 20:25 (1), 06/22/2026 12:40 (2), 06/22/2026 12:52 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.