| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Sporum Forum up to 3.0.9 and classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function of the file comments.cgi. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2007-3213. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Sporum Forum up to 3.0.9 (Forum Software). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file comments.cgi. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in comments.cgi in Sporum Forum 3.0.9 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) view and (2) mode parameters.
The weakness was published 06/12/2007 by r0t (Website). The advisory is shared at vupen.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2007-3213 since 06/14/2007. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (34829), SecurityFocus (BID 24439†), OSVDB (36384†) and Secunia (SA25617†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/12/2007 🔍06/12/2007 🔍
06/12/2007 🔍
06/12/2007 🔍
06/14/2007 🔍
06/14/2007 🔍
03/15/2015 🔍
09/02/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Researcher: r0t
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-3213 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-3213
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-37285
X-Force: 34829
SecurityFocus: 24439 - Sporum Forum Multiple Remote Cross Site Scripting Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 25617 - Sporum Forum "view" and "mode" Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities, Less Critical
OSVDB: 36384 - Sporum Forum comments.cgi Multiple Parameter XSS
Vupen: ADV-2007-2147
Entry
Created: 03/15/2015 15:58Updated: 09/02/2017 10:23
Changes: 03/15/2015 15:58 (46), 09/02/2017 10:23 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.