| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Silicon Labs SiSDK up to 9.0.2. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in length parameter. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-6432. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Silicon Labs SiSDK up to 9.0.2. Affected is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a length parameter vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-130. The product parses a formatted message or structure, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles a length field that is inconsistent with the actual length of the associated data. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. CVE summarizes:
Improper bounds validation in EmberZNet SDK versions 9.0.2 and earlier may result in crashes or dynamic memory leakage.
The advisory is available at siliconlabs.lightning.force.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-6432 since 04/16/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Length parameterCWE: CWE-130 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/16/2026 CVE reserved06/25/2026 Advisory disclosed
06/25/2026 VulDB entry created
06/25/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: siliconlabs.lightning.force.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-6432 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-6432
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-373914
Entry
Created: 06/25/2026 16:58Changes: 06/25/2026 16:58 (63)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.