lobehub LobeChat up to 2.2.9 Message Identifier authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 2.10 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in lobehub LobeChat up to 2.2.9. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Message Identifier Handler. This manipulation causes authorization. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-58580. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in lobehub LobeChat up to 2.2.9. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component Message Identifier Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-639. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
LobeChat through 2.2.9 server-database deployments are vulnerable to broken object-level authorization in MessageModel. The updateMessagePlugin, updatePluginState, updatePluginError, updateTTS and updateTranslate methods filter target rows by message id alone, omitting the userId scope that sibling methods apply, and findMessagePlugin reads back by id alone. Reachable via the corresponding tRPC message procedures, an authenticated user who knows another user's message identifier can overwrite that victim's plugin tool-call metadata, plugin state/error, text-to-speech and translation records on the same instance, and the tampered content is served back to the victim. Exploitation requires knowledge of the victim's non-enumerable message identifier.
The weakness was presented by George Chen as 16534. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-58580 since 07/01/2026. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/02/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.9
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-639 / CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
07/01/2026 CVE reserved07/02/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/02/2026 VulDB entry created
07/02/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 16534Researcher: George Chen
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-58580 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-58580
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-376003
Entry
Created: 07/02/2026 23:05Changes: 07/02/2026 23:05 (76)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.