Dell PowerProtect Data Domain up to 8.7 os command injection

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain up to 8.7. This affects an unknown part. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-49814. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain up to 8.7. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution.
The advisory is shared at dell.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-49814 since 06/01/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/03/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.7.0
- 7.7.1.0
- 7.13.0
- 7.13.1.0
- 7.13.1.1
- 7.13.1.2
- 7.13.1.3
- 7.13.1.4
- 7.13.1.5
- 7.13.1.6
- 7.13.1.7
- 7.13.1.8
- 7.13.1.9
- 7.13.1.10
- 7.13.1.11
- 7.13.1.12
- 7.13.1.13
- 7.13.1.14
- 7.13.1.15
- 7.13.1.16
- 7.13.1.17
- 7.13.1.18
- 7.13.1.19
- 7.13.1.20
- 7.13.1.21
- 7.13.1.22
- 7.13.1.23
- 7.13.1.24
- 7.13.1.25
- 7.13.1.26
- 7.13.1.27
- 7.13.1.28
- 7.13.1.29
- 7.13.1.30
- 7.13.1.31
- 7.13.1.32
- 7.13.1.33
- 7.13.1.34
- 7.13.1.35
- 7.13.1.36
- 7.13.1.37
- 7.13.1.38
- 7.13.1.39
- 7.13.1.40
- 7.13.1.41
- 7.13.1.42
- 7.13.1.43
- 7.13.1.44
- 7.13.1.45
- 7.13.1.46
- 7.13.1.47
- 7.13.1.48
- 7.13.1.49
- 7.13.1.50
- 7.13.1.51
- 7.13.1.52
- 7.13.1.53
- 7.13.1.54
- 7.13.1.55
- 7.13.1.56
- 7.13.1.57
- 7.13.1.58
- 7.13.1.59
- 7.13.1.60
- 7.13.1.61
- 7.13.1.62
- 7.13.1.63
- 7.13.1.64
- 7.13.1.65
- 7.13.1.66
- 7.13.1.67
- 7.13.1.68
- 7.13.1.69
- 7.13.1.70
- 8.0
- 8.1
- 8.2
- 8.3
- 8.3.0
- 8.3.1.0
- 8.3.1.1
- 8.3.1.2
- 8.3.1.3
- 8.3.1.4
- 8.3.1.5
- 8.3.1.6
- 8.3.1.7
- 8.3.1.8
- 8.3.1.9
- 8.3.1.10
- 8.3.1.11
- 8.3.1.12
- 8.3.1.13
- 8.3.1.14
- 8.3.1.15
- 8.3.1.16
- 8.3.1.17
- 8.3.1.18
- 8.3.1.19
- 8.3.1.20
- 8.3.1.21
- 8.3.1.22
- 8.3.1.23
- 8.3.1.24
- 8.3.1.25
- 8.3.1.26
- 8.3.1.27
- 8.3.1.28
- 8.3.1.29
- 8.3.1.30
- 8.4
- 8.5
- 8.6
- 8.6.0
- 8.6.1.0
- 8.6.1.1
- 8.6.1.2
- 8.6.1.3
- 8.6.1.4
- 8.6.1.5
- 8.6.1.6
- 8.6.1.7
- 8.6.1.8
- 8.6.1.9
- 8.6.1.10
- 8.7
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dell.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
06/01/2026 CVE reserved07/03/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/03/2026 VulDB entry created
07/03/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: dell.comAdvisory: dsa-2026-278
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-49814 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-49814
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-376125
Entry
Created: 07/03/2026 17:06Changes: 07/03/2026 17:06 (53)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.