safistudio Bookero.pl Plugin up to 2.2 Shortcode bookero_products hide_products/filter_products cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in safistudio Bookero.pl Plugin up to 2.2 and classified as problematic. The affected element is the function bookero_products of the component Shortcode Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument hide_products/filter_products results in cross site scripting.
This vulnerability was named CVE-2026-6910. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in safistudio Bookero.pl Plugin up to 2.2. This affects the function bookero_products of the component Shortcode Handler. The manipulation of the argument hide_products/filter_products with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Bookero.pl – system rezerwacji online plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `bookero_products` shortcode's `hide_products` (and `filter_products`) attributes in versions up to and including 2.2. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the `bookero_products()` function — the raw attribute value is concatenated directly into an inline `<script>` block without any escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor-level access and above to inject arbitrary web scripts into pages that will execute whenever a user accesses the injected page.
It is possible to read the advisory at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-6910 since 04/23/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/23/2026 CVE reserved07/09/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/09/2026 VulDB entry created
07/09/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-6910 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-6910
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-377163
Entry
Created: 07/09/2026 10:59Changes: 07/09/2026 10:59 (54)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.