loopus Cost Estimation & Payment Forms Builder Plugin up to 10.5.97 Form customerInfos cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.56- |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in loopus Cost Estimation & Payment Forms Builder Plugin up to 10.5.97. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Form Handler. This manipulation of the argument customerInfos causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-9253. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in loopus Cost Estimation & Payment Forms Builder Plugin up to 10.5.97. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the component Form Handler. The manipulation of the argument customerInfos with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The WP Cost Estimation & Payment Forms Builder (E&P Forms) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'customerInfos' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 10.5.97 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-9253 since 05/21/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-42579). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 10.5.0
- 10.5.1
- 10.5.2
- 10.5.3
- 10.5.4
- 10.5.5
- 10.5.6
- 10.5.7
- 10.5.8
- 10.5.9
- 10.5.10
- 10.5.11
- 10.5.12
- 10.5.13
- 10.5.14
- 10.5.15
- 10.5.16
- 10.5.17
- 10.5.18
- 10.5.19
- 10.5.20
- 10.5.21
- 10.5.22
- 10.5.23
- 10.5.24
- 10.5.25
- 10.5.26
- 10.5.27
- 10.5.28
- 10.5.29
- 10.5.30
- 10.5.31
- 10.5.32
- 10.5.33
- 10.5.34
- 10.5.35
- 10.5.36
- 10.5.37
- 10.5.38
- 10.5.39
- 10.5.40
- 10.5.41
- 10.5.42
- 10.5.43
- 10.5.44
- 10.5.45
- 10.5.46
- 10.5.47
- 10.5.48
- 10.5.49
- 10.5.50
- 10.5.51
- 10.5.52
- 10.5.53
- 10.5.54
- 10.5.55
- 10.5.56
- 10.5.57
- 10.5.58
- 10.5.59
- 10.5.60
- 10.5.61
- 10.5.62
- 10.5.63
- 10.5.64
- 10.5.65
- 10.5.66
- 10.5.67
- 10.5.68
- 10.5.69
- 10.5.70
- 10.5.71
- 10.5.72
- 10.5.73
- 10.5.74
- 10.5.75
- 10.5.76
- 10.5.77
- 10.5.78
- 10.5.79
- 10.5.80
- 10.5.81
- 10.5.82
- 10.5.83
- 10.5.84
- 10.5.85
- 10.5.86
- 10.5.87
- 10.5.88
- 10.5.89
- 10.5.90
- 10.5.91
- 10.5.92
- 10.5.93
- 10.5.94
- 10.5.95
- 10.5.96
- 10.5.97
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/21/2026 CVE reserved07/09/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/09/2026 VulDB entry created
07/09/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-9253 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-9253
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-377197
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 07/09/2026 13:54Updated: 07/09/2026 15:06
Changes: 07/09/2026 13:54 (53), 07/09/2026 15:06 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.