Linux Kernel up to 6.18.33/7.0.10 Idpf idpf_ptp_init read_dev_clk_lock missing initialization

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.7$0-$5k0.72

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Linux Kernel up to 6.18.33/7.0.10. It has been classified as problematic. The impacted element is the function idpf_ptp_init of the component Idpf. Performing a manipulation of the argument read_dev_clk_lock results in missing initialization. This vulnerability was named CVE-2026-64162. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Linux Kernel up to 6.18.33/7.0.10. This affects the function idpf_ptp_init of the component Idpf. The manipulation of the argument read_dev_clk_lock with an unknown input leads to a missing initialization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-456. The product does not initialize critical variables, which causes the execution environment to use unexpected values. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: idpf: fix read_dev_clk_lock spinlock init in idpf_ptp_init() In idpf_ptp_init(), read_dev_clk_lock is initialized after ptp_schedule_worker() had already been called (and after idpf_ptp_settime64() could reach the lock). The PTP aux worker fires immediately upon scheduling and can call into idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg_direct(), which takes spin_lock(&ptp->read_dev_clk_lock) on an uninitialized lock, triggering the lockdep "non-static key" warning: [12973.796587] idpf 0000:83:00.0: Device HW Reset initiated [12974.094507] INFO: trying to register non-static key. ... [12974.097208] Call Trace: [12974.097213] <TASK> [12974.097218] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xe0 [12974.097234] register_lock_class+0x4c4/0x4e0 [12974.097249] ? __lock_acquire+0x427/0x2290 [12974.097259] __lock_acquire+0x98/0x2290 [12974.097272] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x310 [12974.097281] ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf] [12974.097311] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190 [12974.097318] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xd2/0x350 [12974.097330] ? __pfx_ptp_aux_kworker+0x10/0x10 [ptp] [12974.097343] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 [12974.097353] ? idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf] [12974.097373] idpf_ptp_read_src_clk_reg+0xb7/0x150 [idpf] [12974.097391] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x88/0x3d0 [12974.097404] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x4e/0x3d0 [12974.097411] idpf_ptp_update_cached_phctime+0x26/0x120 [idpf] [12974.097428] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50 [12974.097436] idpf_ptp_do_aux_work+0x15/0x20 [idpf] [12974.097454] ptp_aux_kworker+0x20/0x40 [ptp] [12974.097464] kthread_worker_fn+0xd5/0x3d0 [12974.097474] ? __pfx_kthread_worker_fn+0x10/0x10 [12974.097482] kthread+0xf4/0x130 [12974.097489] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [12974.097498] ret_from_fork+0x32c/0x410 [12974.097512] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [12974.097519] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [12974.097540] </TASK> Move the call to spin_lock_init() up a bit to make sure read_dev_clk_lock is not touched before it's been initialized.

It is possible to read the advisory at git.kernel.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-64162 since 07/19/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/19/2026).

Upgrading to version 6.18.34 or 7.0.11 eliminates this vulnerability.

Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.7

VulDB Base Score: 4.9
VulDB Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Missing initialization
CWE: CWE-456 / CWE-453
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Upgrade: Kernel 6.18.34/7.0.11

Timelineinfo

07/19/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/19/2026 +0 days CVE reserved
07/19/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
07/19/2026 +0 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: kernel.org

Advisory: git.kernel.org
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2026-64162 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-64162
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-380343

Entryinfo

Created: 07/19/2026 19:42
Changes: 07/19/2026 19:42 (56)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!