EGOR Data::RoaringBitmap::Shared up to 0.1 rb_validate_header roaring.h rb_contains_locked container offset/cardinality out-of-bounds
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 2.23 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in EGOR Data::RoaringBitmap::Shared up to 0.1. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function rb_contains_locked of the file roaring.h of the component rb_validate_header. The manipulation of the argument container offset/cardinality leads to out-of-bounds.
This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-59143. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in EGOR Data::RoaringBitmap::Shared up to 0.1 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function rb_contains_locked of the file roaring.h of the component rb_validate_header. The manipulation of the argument container offset/cardinality with an unknown input leads to a out-of-bounds vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-125. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Data::RoaringBitmap::Shared versions before 0.02 for Perl allow an out-of-bounds read via an unvalidated container offset and cardinality in rb_contains_locked. The attach-time validator rb_validate_header checks the header scalars and region layout against the file size, but does not validate the bucket contents it then trusts. rb_contains_locked forms a container pointer as pool + container_off * 8192 from a raw file-stored offset and then searches over a file-stored cardinality, neither bounded against the container pool capacity or the fixed 8192-byte slot size. A local peer that can write the backing file can leave the header valid while poisoning a bucket, so the next membership query dereferences a file-controlled wild pointer and scans a file-controlled count, reading adjacent memory or crashing the process.
The advisory is shared at metacpan.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-59143 since 07/02/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
Upgrading to version 0.02 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Out-of-boundsCWE: CWE-125 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: Data::RoaringBitmap::Shared 0.02
Timeline
07/02/2026 CVE reserved07/21/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/21/2026 VulDB entry created
07/21/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: metacpan.orgStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-59143 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-59143
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-381029
Entry
Created: 07/21/2026 21:57Updated: 07/21/2026 22:41
Changes: 07/21/2026 21:57 (57), 07/21/2026 22:41 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.