Oracle JDeveloper 12.2.1.4.0/14.1.2.0.0 ADF Faces improper authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | $0-$5k | 0.67- |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Oracle JDeveloper 12.2.1.4.0/14.1.2.0.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component ADF Faces. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-60350. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Oracle JDeveloper 12.2.1.4.0/14.1.2.0.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the component ADF Faces. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authorization vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-285. The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Vulnerability in the Oracle JDeveloper product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: ADF Faces). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle JDeveloper executes to compromise Oracle JDeveloper. While the vulnerability is in Oracle JDeveloper, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle JDeveloper accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).
The advisory is shared at oracle.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-60350 since 07/08/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/22/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1548.002 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.oracle.com
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authorizationCWE: CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
07/08/2026 CVE reserved07/22/2026 Advisory disclosed
07/22/2026 VulDB entry created
07/22/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: oracle.comAdvisory: oracle.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-60350 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-60350
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-381509
Entry
Created: 07/22/2026 03:34Changes: 07/22/2026 03:34 (52)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.