InterSystems Cache Database loop.csp Error cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in InterSystems Cache Database. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file loop.csp. This manipulation of the argument Error causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2007-0437. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in InterSystems Cache Database (the affected version is unknown). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file loop.csp. The manipulation of the argument ERROR with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the sample Cache Server Page (CSP) scripts in InterSystems Cache allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the TO parameter to loop.csp, (2) the VALUE parameter to cookie.csp, and (3) the PAGE parameter to showsource.csp in csp/samples/; and allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (4) the ERROR parameter to csp/samples/xmlclasseserror.csp, and unspecified vectors in (5) object.csp and (6) lotteryhistory.csp in csp/samples/.
The weakness was presented 08/20/2007 (Website). The advisory is shared at mwrinfosecurity.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2007-0437 since 01/23/2007. The attack can be launched remotely. A single authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-38416 for similar entry. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/23/2007 🔍08/20/2007 🔍
08/20/2007 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
10/29/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: mwrinfosecurity.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-0437 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-0437
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-38413
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 12:18Updated: 10/29/2017 14:14
Changes: 03/16/2015 12:18 (41), 10/29/2017 14:14 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:575:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.