Legion of the Bouncy Castle Bouncy Castle for Java DTLS Handshake Reassembler buffer overflow
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 3.10 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Bouncy Castle for Java, Bouncy Castle for Java LTS and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS. This affects an unknown part of the component DTLS Handshake Reassembler. Performing a manipulation results in buffer overflow. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2026-59646. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Bouncy Castle for Java, Bouncy Castle for Java LTS and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (the affected version is unknown). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code of the component DTLS Handshake Reassembler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a buffer overflow vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-120. The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, DTLS handshake reassembler allocates buffer from unchecked 24-bit length. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bctls-fips 1.0.24 (1.0.X series), 2.0.24 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.24 (2.1.X series).
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-59646 since 07/06/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/03/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Buffer overflowCWE: CWE-120 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
07/06/2026 CVE reserved08/03/2026 Advisory disclosed
08/03/2026 VulDB entry created
08/03/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-59646 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-59646
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-385431
Entry
Created: 08/03/2026 03:29Changes: 08/03/2026 03:29 (53)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.