Legion of the Bouncy Castle Bouncy Castle for Java up to 2.1.11 data authenticity

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Bouncy Castle for Java, Bouncy Castle for Java LTS and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS up to 1.84/2.73.11/1.0.11/2.0.11/2.1.11. The impacted element is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to data authenticity. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-59642. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Bouncy Castle for Java, Bouncy Castle for Java LTS and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS up to 1.84/2.73.11/1.0.11/2.0.11/2.1.11. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a data authenticity vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-345. The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. Impacted is integrity. CVE summarizes:

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CMS AuthenticatedData content not bound to MAC when authAttrs present. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.12 (1.0.X series), 2.0.12 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.12 (2.1.X series).

The advisory is shared for download at github.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-59642 since 07/06/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 08/04/2026).

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 331791 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-59642), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (331791) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2026-2622). Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

Affected

• Open Source Bouncy Castle

Productinfo

Type

• Programming Language Software

Vendor

• Legion of the Bouncy Castle

Name

• Bouncy Castle for Java
• Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS
• Bouncy Castle for Java LTS

Version

• 1.0
• 1.0.0
• 1.0.1
• 1.0.2
• 1.0.3
• 1.0.4
• 1.0.5
• 1.0.6
• 1.0.7
• 1.0.8
• 1.0.9
• 1.0.10
• 1.0.11
• 1.1
• 1.2
• 1.3
• 1.4
• 1.5
• 1.6
• 1.7
• 1.8
• 1.9
• 1.10
• 1.11
• 1.12
• 1.13
• 1.14
• 1.15
• 1.16
• 1.17
• 1.18
• 1.19
• 1.20
• 1.21
• 1.22
• 1.23
• 1.24
• 1.25
• 1.26
• 1.27
• 1.28
• 1.29
• 1.30
• 1.31
• 1.32
• 1.33
• 1.34
• 1.35
• 1.36
• 1.37
• 1.38
• 1.39
• 1.40
• 1.41
• 1.42
• 1.43
• 1.44
• 1.45
• 1.46
• 1.47
• 1.48
• 1.49
• 1.50
• 1.51
• 1.52
• 1.53
• 1.54
• 1.55
• 1.56
• 1.57
• 1.58
• 1.59
• 1.60
• 1.61
• 1.62
• 1.63
• 1.64
• 1.65
• 1.66
• 1.67
• 1.68
• 1.69
• 1.70
• 1.71
• 1.72
• 1.73
• 1.74
• 1.75
• 1.76
• 1.77
• 1.78
• 1.79
• 1.80
• 1.81
• 1.82
• 1.83
• 1.84
• 2.0.0
• 2.0.1
• 2.0.2
• 2.0.3
• 2.0.4
• 2.0.5
• 2.0.6
• 2.0.7
• 2.0.8
• 2.0.9
• 2.0.10
• 2.0.11
• 2.1.0
• 2.1.1
• 2.1.2
• 2.1.3
• 2.1.4
• 2.1.5
• 2.1.6
• 2.1.7
• 2.1.8
• 2.1.9
• 2.1.10
• 2.1.11
• 2.73.0
• 2.73.1
• 2.73.2
• 2.73.3
• 2.73.4
• 2.73.5
• 2.73.6
• 2.73.7
• 2.73.8
• 2.73.9
• 2.73.10
• 2.73.11

CPE 2.3info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CPE 2.2info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

Discussion