GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5 ovpn-client.so Native Plugin /cgi-bin/glc ovpn-client.get_recommend_config Hostname command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.9 | $0-$5k | 1.26 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. Affected by this vulnerability is the function ovpn-client.get_recommend_config of the file /cgi-bin/glc of the component ovpn-client.so Native Plugin. The manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to command injection.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-18602. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, has been found in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. This issue affects the function ovpn-client.get_recommend_config of the file /cgi-bin/glc of the component ovpn-client.so Native Plugin. The manipulation of the argument hostname with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-18602. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/03/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
The exploit is available at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.9
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/03/2026 Advisory disclosed08/03/2026 VulDB entry created
08/03/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-18602 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-18602
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-385517
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 08/03/2026 09:00Changes: 08/03/2026 09:00 (60)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: strforexc
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #851542: GL-iNet GL-MT3000 4.4.5 Command Injection (by strforexc)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.