The Seasar Foundation escafeWeb 1.0.4 option.nopage.create cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in The Seasar Foundation escafeWeb 1.0.4. This affects an unknown part of the file option.nopage.create. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2007-4587. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in The Seasar Foundation escafeWeb 1.0.4. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file option.nopage.create. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Easy Software Cafeteria escafeWeb (aka Tuigwaa) 1.0 through 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, possibly related to the setting of option.nopage.create in tuigwaa.properties.
The weakness was disclosed 08/27/2007 by Fukumori (Website). The advisory is shared at escafe.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2007-4587 since 08/28/2007. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (36264), SecurityFocus (BID 25447†), OSVDB (37147†) and Secunia (SA26577†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/27/2007 🔍08/27/2007 🔍
08/27/2007 🔍
08/27/2007 🔍
08/28/2007 🔍
08/28/2007 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
08/27/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: escafe.orgResearcher: Fukumori
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2007-4587 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-4587
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-38557
X-Force: 36264
SecurityFocus: 25447 - Tuigwaa Unspecified Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 26577 - escafeWeb (Tuigwaa) Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability, Less Critical
OSVDB: 37147 - escafeWeb (Tuigwaa) Unspecified Parameter XSS
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 12:18Updated: 08/27/2017 07:34
Changes: 03/16/2015 12:18 (46), 08/27/2017 07:34 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.