Tencent APIJSON up to 8.1.8 Per-role Allow-list Check AbstractSQLConfig.java sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 3.87- |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Tencent APIJSON up to 8.1.8 and classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file AbstractSQLConfig.java of the component Per-role Allow-list Check. This manipulation causes sql injection. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-72565. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Tencent APIJSON up to 8.1.8. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file AbstractSQLConfig.java of the component Per-role Allow-list Check. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A SQL injection vulnerability in Tencent APIJSON through 8.1.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass per-table access control and read arbitrary database tables via the Map-form @having operator. The APIJSONORM library's AbstractSQLConfig.java applies the per-role allow-list check only on the String form of @having but not on the Map form, allowing a guest user to inject raw SQL fragments and read tables that are configured with get:[] (empty, meaning no role can read them).
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-72565 since 08/10/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/10/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/10/2026 Advisory disclosed08/10/2026 CVE reserved
08/10/2026 VulDB entry created
08/10/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-72565 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-72565
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-387397
Entry
Created: 08/10/2026 13:17Changes: 08/10/2026 13:17 (54)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.