| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Battlefront Dropteam 1.3.3. It has been rated as critical. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in format string. This vulnerability was named CVE-2007-5262. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Battlefront Dropteam 1.3.3. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a format string vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-134. The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple format string vulnerabilities in Battlefront Dropteam 1.3.3 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) username, (2) password, and (3) nickname fields in a "0x01" packet.
The weakness was presented 10/08/2007 by Luigi Auriemma (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2007-5262 since 10/08/2007. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (36974), SecurityFocus (BID 25943†) and Secunia (SA27107†). See VDB-39125 and VDB-39124 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Format stringCWE: CWE-134 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/05/2007 🔍10/08/2007 🔍
10/08/2007 🔍
10/08/2007 🔍
10/08/2007 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
09/09/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Luigi Auriemma
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-5262 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-5262
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-39123
X-Force: 36974 - DropTeam 0x1 packet format string
SecurityFocus: 25943 - DropTeam Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 27107 - DropTeam Multiple Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 12:18Updated: 09/09/2018 11:46
Changes: 03/16/2015 12:18 (53), 09/09/2018 11:46 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.