TensorZero up to 2026.5.x Object Storage /internal/object_storage storage_path information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in TensorZero up to 2026.5.x. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /internal/object_storage of the component Object Storage. Performing a manipulation of the argument storage_path results in information disclosure. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2026-54457. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in TensorZero up to 2026.5.x. This affects some unknown functionality of the file /internal/object_storage of the component Object Storage. The manipulation of the argument storage_path with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
TensorZero is an open-source LLMOps platform that unifies an LLM gateway, observability, evaluation, optimization, and experimentation. Prior to 2026.6.0, the TensorZero Gateway /internal/object_storage endpoint accepts a caller-supplied JSON storage_path parameter that dynamically overrides the [object_storage] configuration. Selecting the filesystem storage type allows arbitrary files on the gateway filesystem to be read, including credential files. Selecting the s3_compatible storage type causes outbound object-storage requests to attacker-chosen internal or cloud-metadata endpoints. Exploitation requires access to the gateway, which can be authenticated or unauthenticated depending on deployment configuration. This issue is fixed in version 2026.6.0.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-54457 since 06/15/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 2026.6.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.7
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: TensorZero 2026.6.0
Timeline
06/15/2026 CVE reserved08/21/2026 Advisory disclosed
08/21/2026 VulDB entry created
08/21/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-54457 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-54457
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-394221
Entry
Created: 08/21/2026 23:06Changes: 08/21/2026 23:06 (65)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.