LobeHub LobeChat up to 2.2.15 Adapters /api/agent/webhooks signature verification
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in LobeHub LobeChat up to 2.2.15. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /api/agent/webhooks of the component Adapters. Performing a manipulation results in signature verification. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-85621. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in LobeHub LobeChat up to 2.2.15. This affects some unknown processing of the file /api/agent/webhooks of the component Adapters. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a signature verification vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-347. The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner's agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-85621 since 09/04/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/04/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.5
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Signature verificationCWE: CWE-347 / CWE-345
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/04/2026 Advisory disclosed09/04/2026 CVE reserved
09/04/2026 VulDB entry created
09/04/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-85621 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-85621
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-398817
Entry
Created: 09/04/2026 16:53Changes: 09/04/2026 16:53 (76)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.