Linux Kernel up to 7.2.0 Magicmouse Driver magicmouse_raw_event stack-based overflow

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.8$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Linux Kernel up to 7.2.0. It has been rated as very critical. The affected element is the function magicmouse_raw_event of the component Magicmouse Driver. This manipulation causes stack-based overflow. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2026-80783. The attack needs to be launched locally. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Linux Kernel up to 7.2.0 and classified as very critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function magicmouse_raw_event of the component Magicmouse Driver. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a stack-based overflow vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-121. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: magicmouse: prevent unbounded recursion in magicmouse_raw_event() magicmouse_raw_event() handles DOUBLE_REPORT_ID (0xf7) packets, which pack two touch reports into one, by splitting the packet and calling itself on each half. The only guard against runaway recursion is a "size < 1" check, which stops zero-sized calls but does not bound the recursion depth. A malicious HID device that matches this driver can send a report starting with DOUBLE_REPORT_ID and filled with the sequence [0xf7, 0x00]. Each level consumes two bytes and recurses on the remainder, so an incoming report of up to HID_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE (16 KiB) drives roughly 8000 nested calls. That easily exhausts the 16 KiB kernel stack, leading to a stack overflow: a panic with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK, or memory corruption without it. A double report only ever wraps two normal reports; it is never legitimately nested. Refuse to re-enter the DOUBLE_REPORT_ID case from a recursive call so the recursion depth is bounded to two, while all valid packets keep being parsed exactly as before.

The advisory is shared at git.kernel.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-80783 since 08/26/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/04/2026).

Upgrading to version 5.15.220, 6.1.187, 6.6.156, 6.12.108, 6.18.49, 7.1.11, 7.2.1 or 7.3-rc1 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying the patch 26c45abed62536aabf4033fb6d64cf72e93374e9/8a10a624996f16628234306b46f0cf36707d78bd/d16df755b4493b6d37803c628b2c621d096796a8/bec338b07beb883726b32192c8f01c601bc76fda/70589b0c005db003f6d8ae4db3c4d54fed7b83e4/a33a596d3ad8dfe6c96a368097a028abeee16c17/d095de37f78c5f32a4252ef0f99b84ba76550b86/db8d634128d2ba88d79c0b601e983ebe14bb0519 is able to eliminate this problem.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.2
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.8

VulDB Base Score: 8.2
VulDB Temp Score: 7.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Stack-based overflow
CWE: CWE-121 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Upgrade: Kernel 5.15.220/6.1.187/6.6.156/6.12.108/6.18.49/7.1.11/7.2.1/7.3-rc1
Patch: 26c45abed62536aabf4033fb6d64cf72e93374e9/8a10a624996f16628234306b46f0cf36707d78bd/d16df755b4493b6d37803c628b2c621d096796a8/bec338b07beb883726b32192c8f01c601bc76fda/70589b0c005db003f6d8ae4db3c4d54fed7b83e4/a33a596d3ad8dfe6c96a368097a028abeee16c17/d095de37f78c5f32a4252ef0f99b84ba76550b86/db8d634128d2ba88d79c0b601e983ebe14bb0519

Timelineinfo

08/26/2026 CVE reserved
09/04/2026 +9 days Advisory disclosed
09/04/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
09/04/2026 +0 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: kernel.org

Advisory: git.kernel.org
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2026-80783 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-80783
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-398965

Entryinfo

Created: 09/04/2026 18:36
Changes: 09/04/2026 18:36 (59)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!