Eclipse Jetty up to 12.1.11 Chunked Request Parsing request smuggling
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 1.61+ |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Eclipse Jetty up to 9.4.63/10.0.31/11.0.31/12.0.37/12.1.11. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Chunked Request Parsing. Performing a manipulation results in request smuggling. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-19203. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Eclipse Jetty up to 9.4.63/10.0.31/11.0.31/12.0.37/12.1.11. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code of the component Chunked Request Parsing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a request smuggling vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-444. The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent
(such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two
entities such as a client and server, but it does not
interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that
are consistent with how the messages will be processed by
those entities that are at the ultimate destination. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A client may issue specially crafted HTTP/1.1 chunked requests to a Jetty server that cause Jetty and an intermediary proxy to interpret different request boundaries, potentially resulting in HTTP request smuggling. This is caused by Jetty accepting a lone LF character as a terminator in parts of chunked request parsing. Depending on the Jetty version and configured HTTP compliance mode, this may occur in chunk extensions, chunk data termination, or trailer termination.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-19203 since 08/07/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/08/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 9.4.0
- 9.4.1
- 9.4.2
- 9.4.3
- 9.4.4
- 9.4.5
- 9.4.6
- 9.4.7
- 9.4.8
- 9.4.9
- 9.4.10
- 9.4.11
- 9.4.12
- 9.4.13
- 9.4.14
- 9.4.15
- 9.4.16
- 9.4.17
- 9.4.18
- 9.4.19
- 9.4.20
- 9.4.21
- 9.4.22
- 9.4.23
- 9.4.24
- 9.4.25
- 9.4.26
- 9.4.27
- 9.4.28
- 9.4.29
- 9.4.30
- 9.4.31
- 9.4.32
- 9.4.33
- 9.4.34
- 9.4.35
- 9.4.36
- 9.4.37
- 9.4.38
- 9.4.39
- 9.4.40
- 9.4.41
- 9.4.42
- 9.4.43
- 9.4.44
- 9.4.45
- 9.4.46
- 9.4.47
- 9.4.48
- 9.4.49
- 9.4.50
- 9.4.51
- 9.4.52
- 9.4.53
- 9.4.54
- 9.4.55
- 9.4.56
- 9.4.57
- 9.4.58
- 9.4.59
- 9.4.60
- 9.4.61
- 9.4.62
- 9.4.63
- 10.0.0
- 10.0.1
- 10.0.2
- 10.0.3
- 10.0.4
- 10.0.5
- 10.0.6
- 10.0.7
- 10.0.8
- 10.0.9
- 10.0.10
- 10.0.11
- 10.0.12
- 10.0.13
- 10.0.14
- 10.0.15
- 10.0.16
- 10.0.17
- 10.0.18
- 10.0.19
- 10.0.20
- 10.0.21
- 10.0.22
- 10.0.23
- 10.0.24
- 10.0.25
- 10.0.26
- 10.0.27
- 10.0.28
- 10.0.29
- 10.0.30
- 10.0.31
- 11.0.0
- 11.0.1
- 11.0.2
- 11.0.3
- 11.0.4
- 11.0.5
- 11.0.6
- 11.0.7
- 11.0.8
- 11.0.9
- 11.0.10
- 11.0.11
- 11.0.12
- 11.0.13
- 11.0.14
- 11.0.15
- 11.0.16
- 11.0.17
- 11.0.18
- 11.0.19
- 11.0.20
- 11.0.21
- 11.0.22
- 11.0.23
- 11.0.24
- 11.0.25
- 11.0.26
- 11.0.27
- 11.0.28
- 11.0.29
- 11.0.30
- 11.0.31
- 12.0.0
- 12.0.1
- 12.0.2
- 12.0.3
- 12.0.4
- 12.0.5
- 12.0.6
- 12.0.7
- 12.0.8
- 12.0.9
- 12.0.10
- 12.0.11
- 12.0.12
- 12.0.13
- 12.0.14
- 12.0.15
- 12.0.16
- 12.0.17
- 12.0.18
- 12.0.19
- 12.0.20
- 12.0.21
- 12.0.22
- 12.0.23
- 12.0.24
- 12.0.25
- 12.0.26
- 12.0.27
- 12.0.28
- 12.0.29
- 12.0.30
- 12.0.31
- 12.0.32
- 12.0.33
- 12.0.34
- 12.0.35
- 12.0.36
- 12.0.37
- 12.1.0
- 12.1.1
- 12.1.2
- 12.1.3
- 12.1.4
- 12.1.5
- 12.1.6
- 12.1.7
- 12.1.8
- 12.1.9
- 12.1.10
- 12.1.11
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Request smugglingCWE: CWE-444
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/07/2026 CVE reserved09/08/2026 Advisory disclosed
09/08/2026 VulDB entry created
09/08/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-19203 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-19203
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-399795
Entry
Created: 09/08/2026 14:38Changes: 09/08/2026 14:38 (66)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.