Joomshaper SP Property Extension up to 4.1.2 CSRF Token sendMail cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 3.34+ |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Joomshaper SP Property Extension up to 4.1.2 and classified as problematic. The impacted element is the function sendMail of the component CSRF Token. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-78083. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Joomshaper SP Property Extension up to 4.1.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function sendMail of the component CSRF Token. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification in Property Booking and Agent Contact Endpoints in SP Property < 4.1.4 - The visitor booking (properties.booking) and agent contact form submission (agents.sendmail) endpoints processed POST requests without verifying Joomla session anti-CSRF tokens.
The advisory is shared at joomshaper.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-78083 since 08/22/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/22/2026 CVE reserved09/10/2026 Advisory disclosed
09/10/2026 VulDB entry created
09/10/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: joomshaper.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-78083 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-78083
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-402013
Entry
Created: 09/10/2026 12:14Changes: 09/10/2026 12:14 (65)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.