ipa-lab HackingBuddyGPT up to 0.5.0 ssh_run_command.py ssh_run_command os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 1.66+ |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in ipa-lab HackingBuddyGPT up to 0.5.0 and classified as critical. This impacts the function ssh_run_command of the file src/hackingBuddyGPT/extensions/ssh_run_command.py. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection.
This vulnerability was named CVE-2026-90621. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in ipa-lab HackingBuddyGPT up to 0.5.0. This affects the function ssh_run_command of the file src/hackingBuddyGPT/extensions/ssh_run_command.py. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-90621. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1202 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is shared for download at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/12/2026 Advisory disclosed09/12/2026 VulDB entry created
09/12/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 150
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-90621 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-90621
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-403203
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 09/12/2026 22:27Changes: 09/12/2026 22:27 (57)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: ez-lbz
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #914814: ipa-lab hackingBuddyGPT v1.0 RCE (by ez-lbz)
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.