| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Feng 0.1.15. This impacts an unknown function of the file rtsp_utils.c. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2007-6629. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Feng 0.1.15. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality of the file rtsp_utils.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Interpretation conflict in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a User-Agent header line that contains a carriage-return character, which is considered a line delimiter when the header is split into individual lines, but not when log_user_agent in RTSP_utils.c parses the content of the User-Agent line.
The weakness was published 12/27/2007 by Luigi Auriemma (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vupen.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2007-6629 since 01/03/2008. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 27049†), OSVDB (40537†) and Secunia (SA28229†). Similar entries are available at VDB-40336, VDB-40334, VDB-40333 and VDB-40332. Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/27/2007 🔍12/27/2007 🔍
12/28/2007 🔍
12/28/2007 🔍
01/03/2008 🔍
01/03/2008 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
07/30/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Researcher: Luigi Auriemma
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-6629 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-6629
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-40335
SecurityFocus: 27049 - Feng Multiple Remote Buffer Overflow and Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 28229 - Feng Multiple Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
OSVDB: 40537 - Feng RTSP_utils.c User-Agent Header Handling Remote DoS
Vupen: ADV-2008-0011
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 13:43Updated: 07/30/2021 11:08
Changes: 03/16/2015 13:43 (46), 03/29/2016 01:28 (9), 07/30/2021 11:08 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.