vllm-project vllm up to 0.29.0 thinking_budget_state.py algorithmic complexity
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 2.24+ |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in vllm-project vllm up to 0.29.0. This affects an unknown part of the file vllm/v1/sample/thinking_budget_state.py. This manipulation causes algorithmic complexity. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-92365. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in vllm-project vllm up to 0.29.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file vllm/v1/sample/thinking_budget_state.py. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a algorithmic complexity vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-407. An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached. As an impact it is known to affect availability.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-92365. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1499 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 0.1
- 0.2
- 0.3
- 0.4
- 0.5
- 0.6
- 0.7
- 0.8
- 0.9
- 0.10
- 0.11
- 0.12
- 0.13
- 0.14
- 0.15
- 0.16
- 0.17
- 0.18
- 0.19
- 0.20
- 0.21
- 0.22
- 0.23
- 0.24
- 0.25
- 0.26
- 0.27
- 0.28
- 0.29.0
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Algorithmic complexityCWE: CWE-407 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/16/2026 Advisory disclosed09/16/2026 VulDB entry created
09/16/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 51133
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-92365 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-92365
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-405451
Entry
Created: 09/16/2026 07:54Changes: 09/16/2026 07:54 (54)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: JPengLi
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #935016: vLLM Project vLLM >=0.26.0 Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity (by JPengLi)
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.