geelen mcp-remote up to 0.1.38 authorization-server-metadata.ts information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.16 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in geelen mcp-remote up to 0.1.38. It has been classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file src/lib/authorization-server-metadata.ts. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-51995. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in geelen mcp-remote up to 0.1.38 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block of the file src/lib/authorization-server-metadata.ts. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
An issue in geelen mcp-remote 0.1.32 through 0.1.38 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the src/lib/authorization-server-metadata.ts, src/lib/utils.ts components
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-51995 since 06/08/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/24/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1592 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 0.1.0
- 0.1.1
- 0.1.2
- 0.1.3
- 0.1.4
- 0.1.5
- 0.1.6
- 0.1.7
- 0.1.8
- 0.1.9
- 0.1.10
- 0.1.11
- 0.1.12
- 0.1.13
- 0.1.14
- 0.1.15
- 0.1.16
- 0.1.17
- 0.1.18
- 0.1.19
- 0.1.20
- 0.1.21
- 0.1.22
- 0.1.23
- 0.1.24
- 0.1.25
- 0.1.26
- 0.1.27
- 0.1.28
- 0.1.29
- 0.1.30
- 0.1.31
- 0.1.32
- 0.1.33
- 0.1.34
- 0.1.35
- 0.1.36
- 0.1.37
- 0.1.38
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
ADP CISA Base Score: 7.5
ADP CISA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
06/08/2026 CVE reserved09/24/2026 Advisory disclosed
09/24/2026 VulDB entry created
09/24/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-51995 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-51995
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-409379
Entry
Created: 09/24/2026 17:12Changes: 09/24/2026 17:12 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.