liketrek TREK up to 3.3.0 ssrfGuard ssrfGuard.ts checkSsrf server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.22+ |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in liketrek TREK up to 3.3.0. This affects the function checkSsrf of the file server/src/utils/ssrfGuard.ts of the component ssrfGuard. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-85738. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in liketrek TREK up to 3.3.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function checkSsrf of the file server/src/utils/ssrfGuard.ts of the component ssrfGuard. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.4.0, the checkSsrf logic in server/src/utils/ssrfGuard.ts does not recognize NAT64, 6to4, or Teredo IPv6 transition addresses that encode an IPv4 destination. An authenticated user who controls a DNS record can supply a URL whose AAAA result is a transition address embedding a private, loopback, or link-local IPv4 target, and isAlwaysBlocked and isPrivateNetwork classify the address as allowed. In a deployment that routes the applicable transition format, user-facing imports, webhooks, integrations, or plugin egress can reach internal services or cloud metadata and expose returned information. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-85738 since 09/04/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
Upgrading to version 3.4.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
- Product: https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: TREK 3.4.0
Timeline
09/04/2026 CVE reserved09/24/2026 Advisory disclosed
09/24/2026 VulDB entry created
09/24/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-85738 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-85738
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-409747
Entry
Created: 09/24/2026 20:43Changes: 09/24/2026 20:43 (66)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.