| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in SafeNet Sentinel Protection Server up to 7.4.1 and classified as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2008-0760. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in SafeNet Sentinel Protection Server up to 7.4.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in SafeNet Sentinel Protection Server 7.4.1.0 and earlier, and Sentinel Keys Server 1.0.4.0 and earlier, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a ..\ (dot dot backslash) in the URI. NOTE: this issue reportedly exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-6483.
The weakness was disclosed 02/13/2008 by Luigi Auriemma (Website). The advisory is shared at vupen.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2008-0760 since 02/13/2008. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 27735†) and Secunia (SA28863†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/11/2008 🔍02/12/2008 🔍
02/13/2008 🔍
02/13/2008 🔍
02/13/2008 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
11/08/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Researcher: Luigi Auriemma
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-0760 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-0760
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-41037
SecurityFocus: 27735 - Sentinel Protection Server/Keys Server Backslash Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Secunia: 28863 - SafeNet Sentinel Protection Server/Key Server Directory Traversal Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
Vupen: ADV-2008-0499
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 13:43Updated: 11/08/2017 08:26
Changes: 03/16/2015 13:43 (46), 11/08/2017 08:26 (9)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.