4TUResearchData djehuty up to 26.3.1 SPARQL backend injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.46 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in 4TUResearchData djehuty up to 26.3.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component SPARQL backend. Performing a manipulation results in injection. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-73976. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in 4TUResearchData djehuty up to 26.3.1. This affects an unknown functionality of the component SPARQL backend. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-74. The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
djehuty is a research data repository system developed by 4TU.ResearchData. Prior to version 26.3.2, An unauthenticated attacker can inject SPARQL into the search/listing queries through three separate parameters. Because the affected queries are read (SELECT) queries, this does not write to the store, but it allows: Cross-graph data exfiltration — e.g. UNION-ing in triples from graphs the request was never scoped to (drafts/private/internal data held in the RDF store); denial of service — expensive or malformed queries that tie up the SPARQL backend / web workers. No account or user interaction is required. This issue has been patched in version 26.3.2.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-73976 since 08/13/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1055 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 26.3.2 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: InjectionCWE: CWE-74 / CWE-707 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: djehuty 26.3.2
Timeline
08/13/2026 CVE reserved10/01/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/01/2026 VulDB entry created
10/01/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-73976 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-73976
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-412749
Entry
Created: 10/01/2026 19:42Changes: 10/01/2026 19:42 (67)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.