UTMStack up to 11.2.15 PdfService /api/generate-pdf-report PdfService.downloadPdf url server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.70+ |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in UTMStack up to 11.2.15. It has been classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function PdfService.downloadPdf of the file /api/generate-pdf-report of the component PdfService. Performing a manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-82044. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in UTMStack up to 11.2.15. This affects the function PdfService.downloadPdf of the file /api/generate-pdf-report of the component PdfService. The manipulation of the argument url with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to make the server request arbitrary internal resources by supplying an unvalidated url parameter to the PdfService.downloadPdf() method exposed via GET /api/generate-pdf-report. Attackers can leverage this to force the web-pdf microservice to fetch internal backend endpoints, the OpenSearch cluster, or the cloud instance-metadata service, exposing sensitive internal data rendered into the returned PDF.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-82044 since 08/27/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
Upgrading to version 11.2.16 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
- 11.2.0
- 11.2.1
- 11.2.2
- 11.2.3
- 11.2.4
- 11.2.5
- 11.2.6
- 11.2.7
- 11.2.8
- 11.2.9
- 11.2.10
- 11.2.11
- 11.2.12
- 11.2.13
- 11.2.14
- 11.2.15
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.7
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: UTMStack 11.2.16
Timeline
08/27/2026 CVE reserved10/02/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/02/2026 VulDB entry created
10/02/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-82044 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-82044
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-413229
Entry
Created: 10/02/2026 22:46Changes: 10/02/2026 22:46 (78)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.