HPE ClearPass Policy Manager up to 6.11.15/6.14.0 OnGuard Agent integrity check
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.9 | $5k-$25k | 1.18+ |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in HPE ClearPass Policy Manager up to 6.11.15/6.14.0. It has been classified as very critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component OnGuard Agent. This manipulation causes integrity check. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-76751. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in HPE ClearPass Policy Manager up to 6.11.15/6.14.0 and classified as very critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component OnGuard Agent. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a integrity check vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-354. The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A missing integrity verification vulnerability exists in the OnGuard agent of ClearPass Policy Manager. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected endpoint with the elevated privileges of the agent.
The advisory is shared at support.hpe.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-76751 since 08/19/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/06/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 6.0
- 6.1
- 6.2
- 6.3
- 6.4
- 6.5
- 6.6
- 6.7
- 6.8
- 6.9
- 6.10
- 6.11
- 6.11.0
- 6.11.1
- 6.11.2
- 6.11.3
- 6.11.4
- 6.11.5
- 6.11.6
- 6.11.7
- 6.11.8
- 6.11.9
- 6.11.10
- 6.11.11
- 6.11.12
- 6.11.13
- 6.11.14
- 6.11.15
- 6.12
- 6.13
- 6.14.0
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.hpe.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.9
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (hpe): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Integrity checkCWE: CWE-354 / CWE-345
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/19/2026 CVE reserved10/06/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/06/2026 VulDB entry created
10/06/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: hpe.comAdvisory: support.hpe.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-76751 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-76751
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-414517
Entry
Created: 10/06/2026 22:11Changes: 10/06/2026 22:11 (27), 10/06/2026 22:12 (35)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.