Progressive Robot hMailServer up to 6.3.3 Blowfish Decryption Routine DecryptFromString heap-based overflow
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.9 | $0-$5k | 3.17 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as critical has been identified in Progressive Robot hMailServer up to 6.3.3. The affected element is the function BlowFishEncryptor::DecryptFromString of the component Blowfish Decryption Routine. Such manipulation leads to heap-based overflow.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-103010. Local access is required to approach this attack. No exploit exists.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Progressive Robot hMailServer up to 6.3.3. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function BlowFishEncryptor::DecryptFromString of the component Blowfish Decryption Routine. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a heap-based overflow vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-122. A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc(). Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Heap-based buffer overflow in the legacy Blowfish decryption routine (BlowFishEncryptor::DecryptFromString) in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.3 on Windows allows a local interactive user with no hMailServer credentials to write bytes of their choosing past the end of a 255-byte heap buffer in the hMailServer service process, which runs as LocalSystem by default. The user does this by passing a long hexadecimal string to the COM method Utilities.BlowfishDecrypt, which checked no authentication. The routine converted hexadecimal input of any length into a fixed 255-byte buffer before decrypting it in place. The result is a denial of service (service crash), and possibly code execution with the privileges of the service account.
The advisory is available at gitlab.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-103010 since 09/29/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. Local access is required to approach this attack. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
Upgrading to version 6.3.4 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.8
CNA Vector (GitLab): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Heap-based overflowCWE: CWE-122 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: hMailServer 6.3.4
Timeline
09/29/2026 CVE reserved10/08/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/08/2026 VulDB entry created
10/08/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: gitlab.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-103010 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-103010
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-415322
Entry
Created: 10/08/2026 13:10Changes: 10/08/2026 13:10 (65)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.